What has George W. Bush done for us?

George W. Bush looking into binoculars with dust caps still on In Monty Python's The Life of Brian, Reg asks "What have the Romans done for us?". With George W. Bush campaigning for another term in office, it's the right time to ask what he has done for us, the citizens of the world.

George W. Bush has made the world a more dangerous place
Bombs in Turkey in revenge for Britain's support for Bush George W. Bush says that his "unwavering" leadership is the way to win the war on terror®. However, of the 2,929 terrorism-related deaths around the world from September 2001 to September 2004, 58 percent of them - 1,709 - have occurred this year. (Source: MSNBC).
Senior U.S. intelligence officials note that in fact, the frequency of terrorist attacks carried out by Muslim radicals is increasing, not decreasing. Moreover, they say the attacks carried out by what they now refer to as "central al-Qaida" are being dwarfed by those carried out by affiliates, such Ansar al Sunnah in Iraq, the Chechen rebels and even ad hoc groups like those who blew up the Madrid train stations (ibid.).
You may argue out that this is not Bush's fault, but he is basing his entire credibility on his ability to win the "war".
Tragically, 2,801 people died in the World Trade Center attack. The Indonesian Embassy in London tells us that "In three shocking years since September 11, more civilians have died as a result of the war on terror, than terrorists have killed in the past 35 years. A conservative tabulation of civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq... puts the number at more than 30,000".
It is a simple fact that George W. Bush's vengeful policies have made the world more dangerous, not less.
George W. Bush destroyed the United Nation's authority
Bombs in Madrid in revenge for Spain's support for Bush The international legal rules governing the use of force take as their starting point Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter, which prohibits any nation from using force against another. The charter allows for only two exceptions to this rule: when force is required in self-defense (Article 51) or when the Security Council authorizes the use of force to protect international peace and security (Chapter VII).
Legally, the use of force in self-defense is justified when the need for action is "instant, overwhelming, and leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation".
The World Press Review notes that "such circumstances - in which an armed attack occurs or is imminent - [did] not aptly describe the Iraqi crisis".
Of course the Security Council did not authorise the use of force, which leaves us with the fact that the invasion of Iraq was illegal. The U.N. Secretary General, Kofi Annan said that ,"I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter from our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal".
If the world's only superpower pays no attention to the United Nations, there really is no point in having the institution, and this is directly due to Bush's policies.
George W. Bush has wrecked any implementation of international law, by breaking it
Camp X-ray prisoners Bush has a long history of contempt for international law. In the days after September 11, 2001, he demanded that the Taliban hand over Osama bin Laden. The Taliban wanted evidence that bin Laden was involved, which the U.S. did not provide.
The attacks of September 11 were a crime, and the perpetrators should be charged and given as fair a trial as possible. What we have instead is Camp X-Ray. The wide international legal protests over Camp X-Ray are too numerous to mention, but one particularly powerful report from the Human Rights Watch points out that, "Washington has ignored human rights standards in its own treatment of terrorist suspects. It has refused to apply the Geneva Conventions to prisoners of war from Afghanistan, and has misused the designation of 'enemy combatant' to apply to criminal suspects on U.S. soil".
Bush has decided not to honour the International Criminal Court and even threatened to stop all peacekeeping missions if Americans were subject to the ICC and therefore international law.
Photos of Americans abusing Iraqi prisoners Perhaps the most outrageous and obvious display of illegal behaviour is the Iraqi prisoner abuse. This disgrace speaks for itself.
George W. Bush has seriously endangered the world's environment
Note that it is the world's environment, not the United States'. George W. Bush has:
George W. Bush has directly damaged the US economy
In the first year of office, Bush:
George W. Bush has made a joke of the sanctity of life
Bush makes no secret of his so called pro life views on abortion. If he was genuinely pro life, he would not have tied U.S. foreign aid to pro life policies with the resultant deaths of thousands of African women.
At the same time as proclaiming to be pro life, Bush had 152 people executed whilst Governor of Texas. Whilst in the White House, he has "expanded use of the death penalty through new terrorism-related provisions and he is seeking further broadening of the Patriot Act to allow capital punishment in more cases". Very pro life.
George W. Bush has made the United States into more of a police state
By June 2003, there were an incredible 2,078,570 people in American prisons. That's 480 prison inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents. While the nation contains only 5 percent of the global population, its prisons now house 25 percent of the world's inmates!
Bizarre laws like the Patriot Act will only increase the level and frequency of incarceration.

Authors notes:

  1. All quotations and figures are taken respectable, confirmed sources and hyperlinks are provided where appropriate. If I have made any factual or typographical mistakes, please kindly inform me.
  2. Intelligent debate is welcomed and a feedback form is provided below. If you just disagree with what I have written, please take the care to construct a considered argument based on confirmed facts.
  3. Readers may note that the author has not referred to "President Bush" in this article. This is a reference to the stolen election of 2000.
  4. First publication 2nd October 2004.
  5. Legal terms apply to this document.
  6. Images were taken from Google Images. Copyright may apply to them.

Please comment on this article:


Message:

Privacy policy